Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFelsenthal, Dan S.
dc.contributor.editorNurmi, Hannu
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-15T09:16:55Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-15T09:16:55Z-
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.isbn9783319510613
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/81206-
dc.description.abstractContents: 1 Non-monotonic Voting Methods: An Overview; Abstract; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Types of Monotonicity Failure; 1.3 The Plan of the Book; References; 2 Descriptions of the Voting Methods to Be Analyzed; Abstract; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Five Voting Methods Susceptible to Types of Monotonicity Failure Under Both Fixed and Variable Electorates; 2.2.1 Plurality with Runoff (P-R); 2.2.2 Alternative Vote (AV; aka Instant Runoff Voting; Ranked Choice Voting); 2.2.3 The Coombs Method (Cf. Coombs 1964, pp. 397-399; Straffin 1980; Coombs et al. 1984). Contents: 2.2.4 The Dodgson Method (Cf. Black 1958, pp. 222-234 McLean and Urken 1995, pp. 288-297); 2.2.5 The Nanson Method (Cf. Nanson 1883; McLean and Urken 1995, Chap. 14); 2.3 Eight Voting Methods Susceptible to Types of Monotonicity Failure Under Variable Electorates; 2.3.1 Successive Elimination (Cf. Farquharson 1969); 2.3.2 Bucklin's Method (Cf. Hoag and Hallett 1926, pp. 485-491; Tideman 2006, p. 203); 2.3.3 Majority Judgment (Cf. Balinski and Laraki 2007a, b, 2010); 2.3.4 Copeland's Method (Copeland 1951); 2.3.5 Black's Method (Black 1958, p. 66); 2.3.6 Kemeny's Method (Kemeny 1959. Contents: Kemeny and Snell 1960 Young and Levenglick 1978; Young 1988, 1995); 2.3.7 Schwartz's Method (Schwartz 1972, 1986); 2.3.8 Young's Method (Young 1977); 2.4 Five Main Procedures that Are not Susceptible to Any Monotonicity Failure; 2.4.1 Plurality (or First Past the Post) Voting Procedure; 2.4.2 Approval Voting (Brams and Fishburn 1978, 1983); 2.4.3 Borda's Count (Cf. de Borda 1784; Black 1958; McLean and Urken 1995, pp. 83-89); 2.4.4 Range Voting (Smith 2000); 2.4.5 The Minmax Procedure; References; 3 Some Theoretical Results on Monotonicity-Related Properties of Voting Rules; Abstract. Contents: 3.1 Smith's (1973) Theorem3.2 Fishburn's (1982) Theorems; 3.3 Moulin's (1988) and Pérez's (2001) Theorems; 3.4 Saari's (1989) Results; 3.5 Muller and Satterthwaite (1977) Theorem; References; 4 Five Voting Rules Susceptible to Types of Monotonicity Failure Under Both Fixed and Variable Electorates; Abstract; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Types of Monotonicity Failure of the Plurality with Runoff Method Under Fixed Electorates; 4.2.1 An Initial Situation with a Condorcet Winner; 4.2.1.1 Upward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Better Off [UB]. Contents: 4.2.1.2 Upward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Worse Off [UW]4.2.1.3 Downward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Better Off [DB]; 4.2.1.4 Impossibility: Downward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Worse Off [DW]; 4.2.2 An Initial Situation with a Top Cycle; 4.2.2.1 Upward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Better Off [UB]; 4.2.2.2 Upward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Worse Off [UW]; 4.2.2.3 Downward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Better Off [DB]; 4.3 Types of Monotonicity Failure of the Alternative Vote Method Under Fixed Electorates. Identifier: ISBN 9783319510613 (electronic bk.); ISBN 3319510614 (electronic bk.) 10.1007 978-3-319-51061-3 doi; BNB GBB8N7257; System number: 019164705
dc.format.extent97 p.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rights©The Author(s)
dc.subjectPolitical science; Voting; POLITICAL SCIENCE -- Political Process -- Elections; POLITICAL SCIENCE -- Political Process -- General; Voting; Business and Economics -- Economics -- Theory; Philosophy -- Political; Economic theory and philosophy; Social and p
dc.subject.ddc324.6 5
dc.titleMonotonicity failures afflicting procedures for electing a single candidate
dc.typeBook
Appears in Collections:Khoa học xã hội và hành vi


  • 2017_Book_MonotonicityFailuresAfflicting.pdf
    • Size : 1,23 MB

    • Format : Adobe PDF

    • View : 
    • Download : 
  • Full metadata record
    DC FieldValueLanguage
    dc.contributor.authorFelsenthal, Dan S.
    dc.contributor.editorNurmi, Hannu
    dc.date.accessioned2020-04-15T09:16:55Z-
    dc.date.available2020-04-15T09:16:55Z-
    dc.date.issued2017
    dc.identifier.isbn9783319510613
    dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/81206-
    dc.description.abstractContents: 1 Non-monotonic Voting Methods: An Overview; Abstract; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Types of Monotonicity Failure; 1.3 The Plan of the Book; References; 2 Descriptions of the Voting Methods to Be Analyzed; Abstract; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Five Voting Methods Susceptible to Types of Monotonicity Failure Under Both Fixed and Variable Electorates; 2.2.1 Plurality with Runoff (P-R); 2.2.2 Alternative Vote (AV; aka Instant Runoff Voting; Ranked Choice Voting); 2.2.3 The Coombs Method (Cf. Coombs 1964, pp. 397-399; Straffin 1980; Coombs et al. 1984). Contents: 2.2.4 The Dodgson Method (Cf. Black 1958, pp. 222-234 McLean and Urken 1995, pp. 288-297); 2.2.5 The Nanson Method (Cf. Nanson 1883; McLean and Urken 1995, Chap. 14); 2.3 Eight Voting Methods Susceptible to Types of Monotonicity Failure Under Variable Electorates; 2.3.1 Successive Elimination (Cf. Farquharson 1969); 2.3.2 Bucklin's Method (Cf. Hoag and Hallett 1926, pp. 485-491; Tideman 2006, p. 203); 2.3.3 Majority Judgment (Cf. Balinski and Laraki 2007a, b, 2010); 2.3.4 Copeland's Method (Copeland 1951); 2.3.5 Black's Method (Black 1958, p. 66); 2.3.6 Kemeny's Method (Kemeny 1959. Contents: Kemeny and Snell 1960 Young and Levenglick 1978; Young 1988, 1995); 2.3.7 Schwartz's Method (Schwartz 1972, 1986); 2.3.8 Young's Method (Young 1977); 2.4 Five Main Procedures that Are not Susceptible to Any Monotonicity Failure; 2.4.1 Plurality (or First Past the Post) Voting Procedure; 2.4.2 Approval Voting (Brams and Fishburn 1978, 1983); 2.4.3 Borda's Count (Cf. de Borda 1784; Black 1958; McLean and Urken 1995, pp. 83-89); 2.4.4 Range Voting (Smith 2000); 2.4.5 The Minmax Procedure; References; 3 Some Theoretical Results on Monotonicity-Related Properties of Voting Rules; Abstract. Contents: 3.1 Smith's (1973) Theorem3.2 Fishburn's (1982) Theorems; 3.3 Moulin's (1988) and Pérez's (2001) Theorems; 3.4 Saari's (1989) Results; 3.5 Muller and Satterthwaite (1977) Theorem; References; 4 Five Voting Rules Susceptible to Types of Monotonicity Failure Under Both Fixed and Variable Electorates; Abstract; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Types of Monotonicity Failure of the Plurality with Runoff Method Under Fixed Electorates; 4.2.1 An Initial Situation with a Condorcet Winner; 4.2.1.1 Upward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Better Off [UB]. Contents: 4.2.1.2 Upward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Worse Off [UW]4.2.1.3 Downward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Better Off [DB]; 4.2.1.4 Impossibility: Downward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Worse Off [DW]; 4.2.2 An Initial Situation with a Top Cycle; 4.2.2.1 Upward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Better Off [UB]; 4.2.2.2 Upward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Worse Off [UW]; 4.2.2.3 Downward Monotonicity Failure-Dynamic Voters Better Off [DB]; 4.3 Types of Monotonicity Failure of the Alternative Vote Method Under Fixed Electorates. Identifier: ISBN 9783319510613 (electronic bk.); ISBN 3319510614 (electronic bk.) 10.1007 978-3-319-51061-3 doi; BNB GBB8N7257; System number: 019164705
    dc.format.extent97 p.
    dc.language.isoen
    dc.publisherSpringer
    dc.rights©The Author(s)
    dc.subjectPolitical science; Voting; POLITICAL SCIENCE -- Political Process -- Elections; POLITICAL SCIENCE -- Political Process -- General; Voting; Business and Economics -- Economics -- Theory; Philosophy -- Political; Economic theory and philosophy; Social and p
    dc.subject.ddc324.6 5
    dc.titleMonotonicity failures afflicting procedures for electing a single candidate
    dc.typeBook
    Appears in Collections:Khoa học xã hội và hành vi


  • 2017_Book_MonotonicityFailuresAfflicting.pdf
    • Size : 1,23 MB

    • Format : Adobe PDF

    • View : 
    • Download :